Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2016
Publication Title
Jacobs Journal of Biostatistics
Abstract
We occasionally need to make a decision or a series of decisions based on a small sample. In some cases, an investigator is knowledgeable about a parameter of interest in some degrees or is accessible to various sources of prior information. Yet, two or more experts cannot have an identical prior distribution for the parameter. In this manuscript, we discuss the use of a consensus prior and compare two classes of Bayes estimators. In the first class of Bayes estimators, the contribution of each prior opinion is determined by observing data. In the second class, the contribution of each prior opinion is determined after observing data. Bayesian designs for Phase I clinical trials allocate trial participants at new experimental doses based on accumulated information, while the typical sample sizes are fairly small. Using simulations, we illustrate the usefulness of a combined estimate in the early phase clinical trials.
Recommended Citation
Steven B. Kim. An Alternative Perspective on Consensus Priors with Applications to Phase I Clinical Trials. J J Biostat. 2016, 1(1): 006.
Comments
Open Access article
Published in Jacobs Journal of Biostatistics